Posted by Rich (188.8.131.52) on September 01, 2003 at 18:13:18:
In Reply to: Colonel Gaddafi posted by Jan den Breejen (184.108.40.206) on September 01, 2003 at 14:23:09:
> Could Khadaffi be more of a unhealthy Self Confident Style / narcissistic status seeker than Adventurous Style terrorist?
Don't forget the Idiosyncratic Style! Gaddafi has toned it down as he has grown older, but he sounded like a 1960's radical lefist when he first seized power in 1969. He proposed to have the Libyan governemt abolished, and a completely cooperative society formed to replace it.... needless to say, he never gave up power. I would say that he is an unhealthy Self-Confident & Idiosyncratic-Dramatic. I type him as a 3W4 or 4W3. I rule him out being an E 7. At least for political reasons, he has made much of simple and austere life. Publicly living in a tent like a desert deweller. The USA attempt to kill him in April, 1986, failed because he was in a tent in courtyard of the complex, being bombed not in one of the buildings. ( A duaghter was killed; Pan Am 103 blown up in 1988, was payback...? ) Rich
> case text citation:
> Gaddafi: 'God curse money!'
> by Paul Reynolds
> BBC News Online world affairs correspondent
> Ever since he came to power in a military coup against the ancient King Idris, who was off having treatment in a Turkish spa in September 1969, the Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi has been a master of mercurial manoeuvres.
> Colonel Gaddafi defending deals
> It remains to be seen whether his latest flourish - an agreement to increase compensation for the bombing of the French UTA DC-10 in 1989 - represents another clever diplomatic stroke or is the sign of a weakening figure getting desperate to see off his enemies at any price.
> Certainly he could not afford to have France block a UN resolution formally lifting sanctions. But Libya's position had previously been that a French court had decided compensation for the UTA bombing in 1999, and it would pay no more.
> The court awarded a paltry $33m, compared to the $2.7 billion won for the Pan Am attack in direct negotiations with Libya by the US and Britain.
> Now he is having to go on the offensive to justify what he has done in both deals. He has stepped up the rhetoric, as if to protect himself against internal criticism.
> In a speech marking the 34th anniversary of his coup, he presented the French deal and the Lockerbie settlement which preceded it (together with an offer to pay compensation for the bombing of the La Belle nightclub in Berlin in 1986) as simply the defence of Libya by cash.
> "God curse money!"
> This is what he said: "God curse money! What is money for? With money we defend our country. I believe that the UTA and Lockerbie issues are behind us and we, God willing, have entered a new era."
> The BBC Monitoring transcript records that there was applause at this statement.
> He went on: "Through wisdom, Libyans' courage and the skill in managing the strategic battle, in managing this dangerous conflict with nuclear powers, money is not important. We have our dignity and we are not interested in money. We have reached a new era with the West.
> God curse money! What is money for? With money we defend our country. I believe that the UTA and Lockerbie issues are behind us and we, God willing, have entered a new era
> Colonel Gaddafi
> He listed other ways in which Libya had "fought the liberation battle with courage." These ranged from supporting the Palestinians with arms, to supplying the Egyptians with fast rubber dinghies to cross the Suez Canal in their 1973 war with Israel, and to giving help to liberation movements all over Africa.
> "We liberated South Africa, Zimbabwe, Guinea Bissau, Cap Verde and Angola," he declared. He did not mention his support for the IRA, which was substantial.
> "Now we are reaping the fruits of our struggle. Africa is with us, peoples are with us and support us. Our voice is heard and respected," said the Libyan leader.
> All that was different now, he suggested, was the means by which Libya and its cause was being defended.
> Novel defence
> It is a novel defence, and it is unclear whether it will convince Libyans who might privately be quite angered at the size of the settlements.
> In return, of course, Libya will get UN sanctions, already in suspense, formally lifted, but Libya has not been able to wipe the slate clean yet. American sanctions remain for the time being.
> Libya expert Professor Tim Niblock of Exeter University pointed to one reason for the Colonel's decisions: "There are signs that Colonel Gaddafi and those around him feel that things will go badly for regimes which do not make their peace with the United States."
> Professor Niblock told News Online that, in the case of the UTA plane, there was an extra incentive. "Not only could France hold up the lifting of UN sanctions, it is in Libya's interest not to be seen selling out to the Americans over Lockerbie but to be making an agreement with Europeans as well. Gaddafi wants to have good relations with both the US and the EU."
> In interests of the West
> It has been in the interests of the West to draw the teeth of the Libyan tiger.
> But, having seen what happened to Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi might well regard himself as lucky to have survived at all. It is unlikely that an attack on an American civilian airliner would these days result in anything less than violent regime change for those responsible.
> There are signs that Colonel Gaddafi and those around him feel that things will go badly for regimes which do not make their peace with the United States.
> Prof Tim Niblock Exeter University
> Somehow, the Colonel escaped Saddam's fate. He was made to pay a financial price instead. The United States was the most reluctant to make a deal and France was the most keen, with Britain somewhere in the middle as usual. But everyone agrees that Colonel Gaddafi has been put on notice and will know that any future terrorist actions by him will surely meet with a more severe response.
> The Colonel's main problems from now on might well be with his own fellow citizens. A traveller who was in Libya a few months ago reported that he had not heard criticism of the Libyan Government made so openly before.
> Such a comment does not mean that the end of Colonel Gaddafi is nigh. But it could be a sign that - even among Libyans - he has lost the prestige he has so earnestly sought.
> E-mail this to a friend Printable version
> LINKS TO MORE EUROPE STORIES
> SelectSubmarine search goes onLibya agrees bombing dealBove barred from Mexico summitReality TV show irks French PMMinister calms Corsica fearsKelly's widow tells of 'nightmare'New blow to Norwegian royalsDutch to prescribe cannabisGermany tests road toll systemRed wine may protect smokersSenegalese 'baggage' migrant thwartedIvanisevic 'to retire soon'Chelsea sign MakeleleEuro fans lobby Swedish votersPortugal abuse hearings haltedEU ministers plan film boostEU minnows plan constitution changeNegligence blamed in sub tragedySpain's Aznar chooses his successorEU rejects cutting Arafat linksThe culinary United NationsCossacks back to fight againUphill struggle for German school reformKraftwerk reveal cycling inspirationCorpses prompt French soul searchingEuropean press reviewProgrammes and schedules
> WATCH AND LISTEN
> The BBC's Allan Little
> "[Libyan] state television said Colonel Gaddafi had a telephone conversation with President Chirac"
> SEE ALSO:
> Impasse over French bombing deal
> 24 Aug 03 | Europe
> UTA 772: the forgotten flight
> 19 Aug 03 | UK
> Libya completes Lockerbie payout
> 22 Aug 03 | Americas
> Move to end Libya sanctions
> 19 Aug 03 | UK
> RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
> Colonel Muammar Gaddafi official site
> French presidency
> The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Post a Followup