Posted by TheBlob (formerly Raz62) (18.104.22.168) on June 18, 2003 at 09:15:49:
In Reply to: Re: To the Type 4 Ladies posted by R (22.214.171.124) on June 18, 2003 at 07:17:25:
> > > Most Traumatic Experience #2
> > ***Yeah what do you need this attention for anyway. You had your day in the sun when you were young and now its her turn. You are old and washed up and thats just life.
> You complete idiot!!! How do you know she had her day in the sun? Maybe she NEVER had it, and now the chance for any of that is fading ...
> How could you be so thougtless?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks for your concern, Rho, but he (P) is very much a Six and they can be too blunt, but I think that is what he honestly thinks (40=washed up). Don't worry, I did have my "day in the sun" (not literally, though, I've shunned sunlight since age 21 and my skin is pretty decent because of shunning it.)
I think P is very wrong about "40=washed up" because two women I know just had babies -- for one woman, she is 42 and it's only her second child, the other was 40 and had her third. (She also has a new husband to go with the baby who is only in his mid-20s but that's another story, but it still proves that 40 something doesn't mean washed up in sexual attractiveness.)
I guess my conclusion is that, of the population of heterosexual males, there is a significant percentage who have very very limited, conventional (and infantile in my opinion) "sexual attraction" radar. But then that still leaves hundreds or even thousands of them (dare I say millions?) who would be SMITTEN by a woman of maturity and accomplishment who is also half decent looking.
Post a Followup