Posted by Val (126.96.36.199) on July 24, 2003 at 21:23:44:
In Reply to: Re: 'Mean' types posted by Ella (188.8.131.52) on July 22, 2003 at 11:44:37:
> > > Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou!
> > > What an amazing and knowledgeable response!
> > > ~Grins~
> > > I've tried the eclectic energies test, but had some time constaints- I'll make sure I do it again when I have the time.
> > > Your description of the Sexual variant is fantastic, and something I most definitely resonate with- socket without a plug describes my internal emotional space perfectly!
> > You're welcome. :)
> I always thought mean types were what you might be perceived as by someone who doesn't really know you. For instance, I'm a 4w3 whose mean type is a 2w3 - clean, annoying helpful, with the same self-concious 3wing.
> But my mind is open and I might be wrong.
Went to the Enneagram Institute board to check it out. Your Mean Type is the type you appear to be in practice. Just took the extended 126-question Similar Minds test myself and got main type 4w5 and mean type... 4w5. Thanks for the correction.
I dunno about that test. It fascinates me how this guy continually changes it. This time I got Sexual variant. Weird.
Post a Followup