Posted by Dee (184.108.40.206) on August 11, 2003 at 08:52:41:
In Reply to: I have suspected ADD for a long time.... posted by emoot (220.127.116.11) on August 04, 2003 at 12:20:09:
> You know, I bought the book "Driven to Distraction"- two years ago- because I was beginning to recognize some signs of ADD in my life(And as you might suspect, for perhaps too obvious of a reason or too much irony.... I have not finished it yet) I always have a least four or five books that I am trying to read at any given time. I rarely finish a book, but I read constantly.
> When I was in school no one had ever heard of ADD/ADHD. Some of my teachers recognized my creativity but that gift was easily canceled out by my inability to "do math". I could do it, though, but it was boring and I didn't like it very much. My IQ tested in the gifted range, but my grades fluctuated between As, Bs and Cs......
> I always felt like I was smarter than I was performing but because my grades didn't reflect it ... I spent much time thinking that I might be not so smart. Occasionally, I would blow the top out of some standardized test and it would cause notice but my teacher's would tell me that I was not applying myself on a consistent basis. In other words....they were telling me that I was lazy.
> So of course, I internalized it and it only added to my already poor self image. When I got to college, I was much happier..... I performed much better in college.... it was more interesting and challenging.
> It seems to me that ADD has not been clearly defined yet. It looks to me that there are two factions. One which thinks it is a total learning disorder and needs to be remedied with drug treatment, and another which thinks that very many people who have been diagnosed with it are just global learners.
> Break that down into personality types.... the global learners are ENTPs, INTPs, INFPs and ENFPs, right? Where is our attention?
> N = Listening to inner voice. Paying attention to our mind's eye and our mind's ear.....introspecting. (daydreaming, making inferences, imagining, musing, or wondering about things not in our presence.)
> Jung said that we cannot observe what is going on around us while we are engaged in our own intropective thoughts. When we observe what is going on around us we cannot at the same time observe what's going on within us.) So the concrete world around Ns seems merely a problem to be solved. Absorbed in our inner idealistic thoughts... we can miss concrete details and facts right in front of us. The tendency looks like absent mindedness. It is a natural disinterest in the concrete world around us and a natural pleasure for inner thoughts.
> Put that N preference into a S preference run classroom and you've got conflict. Largely Schools are organizations set up and run....by ESFJ/ TJ mentality. Rules and rote learning- (even the words are boring)..... Everything is scheduled and organized. Not much room for creativity.
> P = A preference for openess, new information, flexibility and opportunity. (Learning, perhaps best, through exploration)
> It is no wonder that NPs have a difficult time making themselves fit into school and perform well..... when they have almost a natural point to point conflict with how school is taught and set up. (not that it is anybody's fault.... it is just the way that it is)
> In other words.... I know how much I live in my head....95% of the time it seems. It takes a lot of energy for me to focus on the nitty gritty details of daily life. But I sqeeze myself to do it(because it is unavoidably necessary for life).... but it is never comfortable.
> Then I think of the SJs. Those that are in their natural comfort zone in the real world most of the time. Where schedules, rules, details and rote learning cater to their natural tendencies.
> Because SJs types are more prevalent in population and education is set up on SJ organization.... they must thrive in that atmosphere of learning. But then I think, that NPs struggle at best in that kind of pond.....but manage to compensate for it by being smart enough to halfway do something and still get a decent grade.
> I often wonder what it would be like if it was the other way around. Would SJ types struggle in a educational system set up for NPs? Where exploratory learning was encouraged and creativity stressed. Would SJs be labeled with a learing disorder.....CDD- Creative Deficeit Disorder?
> I think.... what would school be like if a type of teaching could cater to the natural tendencies of intuitive perceivers?
> I guess, all in all, I go with the notion that many ADDers are just NP, creative types who have been misunderstood....schoolastically speaking.. Also, I think that it is something that will get called a fault or disorder.... but that doesn't make it a fair call. Plus I think these overt misunderstandings only compound the problems that NPs face. I mean when a kid has a different learning style and gets called lazy for thinking the way he is naturally geared....does that not do something emotionally to him?
> I think the reality of it is..... that if you have an NP preference.... you will struggle in the real world because it will never be where your natural tendency is. However I think that there is a way to help NPs assimilate better through a different type of learning technique.
> It would be neat to have a school to encourage creativity and explorative learning while at the same time molding those kids to assimilate into the concrete world by teaching them tecniques to deal with and strengthen their sensory sides. So at least they could function more easily and be more productive with their innovative ideas.
> I don't know to what extent this type of thing is even recognized in today's educational realm. (it seems that with all the info out there that somebody must be making the link that NP/creative personalities resemble ADD but are in fact not disordered, but merely need a different learning atmosphere. From what I know from my ESFJ educator mom in law.... a lot of kids are still lumped under the heading of ADD... she's convinced that these aren't smart kids.
> That kind of scares me.... when I think of what else I know and my own experience.
> Does anybody else have any ideas on this?
I to have the book Driven to Distraction. If you read my ADD post I just put up, you'll see I'm relieved to know that other Type 4's on here are speaking about ADD. You know the story of Jim, I believe he is a Type 3. Anyway, I've had this book for 3 years. My psychiatrist I had at that time ask me to buy it before he sent me off to another doctor who specializes in ADD/ADHD. I couldn't understand him asking me to buy this book when he new that I don't read books. I bought it just the same and never read it until now. I have a hard time applying myself to reading or tasks at hand. I too did well with IQ tests but still managed to fail grade 2 though to grade 8 whick I failed grade 8 twice. They could never figure me out though because when they would do testing on me, I always passed their IQ tests... lol. Anyway, long story short is I'm now getting help for my ADD. I told my councellor that I have a triple wammy because I'm Type 4 wing-two with ADD. My life has been seens through blood shot eyes my whole life. No exageration, I go through Visine and products prescribed for me from the optomistrist to help with my sleepy red eyes. I am going to stop using those medications because I realize that my sore eyes are caused from daydreaming (when you day dream, you're not blinking at the rate you should amongst other things). With the medication for ADD that I'm going to be put on tomorrow, I'm hoping to overcome different side effects I've had from my triple wammee life, but I know it's not a cure..., that's why I'm in councelling. I'll keep you guys updated.
Post a Followup