Posted by Josie (18.104.22.168) on June 16, 2003 at 08:40:27:
In Reply to: Re: ON STOIC PHILOSOPHY posted by Charlie (22.214.171.124) on June 15, 2003 at 16:21:24:
Your wordy little ramble is totally irrelevant to the matter at hand. You don't even address any of my points, my arguments against your phony 'intellectualism'.
How does the Enneagram ignore emotions?! It doesn't at all... What the hell makes you think that in the first place?!
Secondly, I never claimed to have 'invented' the Enneagram, I know very well that those ideas that work were found by others first. (I've even named Enneagram experts in a couple of my posts.) You are claiming I've said things that I've never actually said.
You are a lousy debater, for two primary reasons;
1. Instead of actually directly addressing the topic, you spout off groups of words that have extremely little meaning without a proper context (which you don't give), not even relevant to anything previously discussed. You think we're all idiots who'd be impressed by this... we're not.
2. You claim I've said things I haven't even said! For example, you claim that I said I 'invented' the Enneagram, even when I never said such a thing, and I have in fact mentioned the educators I've learned from.
No matter how big the words you choose are, this is Grade Four level recess bickering...
You're a very childish man (or woman), obviously. You come to a place where people like the Enneagram and like talking about it, and you try to pick a fight 'for the fun of it'. How petty... YOU ARE A TROLL.
I'll no longer reply to your posts, you quite clearly 'get off' from all of this. I've said my piece. I'll certainly reply to other people's posts when appropriate here, BUT NOT YOURS. YOU ARE A TROLL.
Josie the 7w6
Post a Followup