Re: knowledge v. perception (Brian & Hal)

Posted by walter on August 21, 1998 at 11:32:07:

In Reply to: knowledge v. perception (Brian & Hal) posted by kronus on August 17, 1998 at 16:21:23:

************
Kronos comment:

: This began as a discussion about Zen and the ancient koans. It has evolved as a discussion about philosophical doctrines concerning perceptions and knowledge.

**big snip***

: Now apply this to the conundrum of FOUR "Intuiting and sensing" versus a EVEN "Sensing and intuiting".

Walter might want to interject his research here to explain my inconsistency with his findings!

NOTE: My suspicion is that most SEVENS "rate-out" about equally in N/S MBTI functions; this allows them to intellectualize the functions of parachutes and rationalize the probabilities that a singularly fatal accident won't occur to them, yet enjoy the addrenaline rush of the possibilities that they are wrong! Why else would they be SEVENS.)

**************************************
Walter Comment:

Hi Kronos. I just got back from a trip yesterday and checked the becca board. I often scan the interesting exchange of messages without making a comment. I found your invitation, and I'd be happy to explore S-N perception for Enneagram Point Seven or Four with you. We may be closer on this subject than you think.

What S-N Perception proposition do you want to begin with?

Walter
*********************************

Follow Ups:

• A Plausible Hypothesis Kronus 18:13:42 8/21/98 (4)
  • Re: A Plausible Hypothesis walter 13:26:35 8/23/98 (3)
    • Re: A Plausible Hypothesis Kronus 11:05:13 8/25/98 (1)
      • Re: A Plausible Hypothesis walter 21:50:04 8/25/98 (0)
    • Re: A Plausible Hypothesis Kronus 10:24:47 8/24/98 (0)

Post a Followup